tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1074544362418990271.post3778828685989055634..comments2023-10-03T07:15:04.033-07:00Comments on Might and Armor: The Weaponry of World War II: To B or Not to B? Take the Poll.The Victory Networkhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04085561235095102028noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1074544362418990271.post-38059688874818344542009-07-22T20:22:10.165-07:002009-07-22T20:22:10.165-07:00I don't think the Boeing B-17 was better than ...I don't think the Boeing B-17 was better than the Consolidated B-24 and the numbers produced indicate the reverse. The Boeing was an older design and didn't have the range of its competitor. Neither should be compared to the B-29 which was a later design again and built to different specifications which made it larger, and pressurized. The chronic unreliability of its engines were its single drawback.Tecumsehhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15291277077505419690noreply@blogger.com